Derek Muller, a law professor at Notre Dame University, mentioned “it seems no,” noting that the liberals complained that the majority ruling forecloses some other ways for Congress to implement the provision. Rick Hasen, a law professor on the University of California-Los Angeles, wrote that it’s frustratingly unclear what the bounds could be on Congress. It’s unclear whether the ruling leaves open the possibility Law News that Congress might refuse to certify the election of Trump or any other presidential candidate it sees as having violated Section 3. The justices sidestepped the politically fraught issue of insurrection in their opinions Monday. The Supreme Court on Monday unanimously restored Donald Trump to 2024 presidential primary ballots, rejecting state attempts to ban the Republican former president over the Capitol riot.
- In reality, I consider that this has been the human condition for generations, whereby folks have been striving to search out happiness.
- That suggestion is grotesque.” He known as on the judge to reject the “barbaric proposal” for a “brilliant, advanced and humane person” who doesn’t use medication, not often drinks and is a first-time offender.
- Takeaways From Day 2 of the Hearing in the Georgia Trump CaseIn questioning a key witness, defense legal professionals didn’t undercut assertions by the prosecutors whom they’re trying to get disqualified from the election interference case.
- Maddy Wood, who was 10 when her mother was murdered, informed the BBC she nervous “poor execution” of the laws by police forces “could probably outcome within the loss of extra lives”.